<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Add User Interaction To Your Videos &#8211; Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webvideouniversity.com/blog/2008/11/10/how-to-add-user-interaction-to-your-videos-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webvideouniversity.com/blog/2008/11/10/how-to-add-user-interaction-to-your-videos-part-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:23:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dbroom</title>
		<link>http://webvideouniversity.com/blog/2008/11/10/how-to-add-user-interaction-to-your-videos-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>dbroom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webvideouniversity.com/blog/?p=132#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Hey Dave,

Thanks for the post today on Veeple. I am VP of content at Veeple and we are excited to see the response we are getting on our interactivity. You are right in that the interactivity is not &quot;embedded&quot; into the video but rather acts like a piece of cellophane that wraps over the video and is &quot;activated&quot; when used through our player. The cool thing is that it will work with any site or blog that allows embedding of the video code, which is quite prevalent these days, and growing quickly. Or main customer is the web publisher who uses video on their own site or blog. Here is a &quot;real-world&quot; example from one of our customer&#039;s site (just click on the video):
  
http://pacifichealingarts.com/book_description.php  

It is also much deeper than YouTube&#039;s interactivity as it launches in-screen Info Panels when you click on an object or you can launch to an external website of your choice.

Thanks again for the post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dave,</p>
<p>Thanks for the post today on Veeple. I am VP of content at Veeple and we are excited to see the response we are getting on our interactivity. You are right in that the interactivity is not &#8220;embedded&#8221; into the video but rather acts like a piece of cellophane that wraps over the video and is &#8220;activated&#8221; when used through our player. The cool thing is that it will work with any site or blog that allows embedding of the video code, which is quite prevalent these days, and growing quickly. Or main customer is the web publisher who uses video on their own site or blog. Here is a &#8220;real-world&#8221; example from one of our customer&#8217;s site (just click on the video):</p>
<p><a href="http://pacifichealingarts.com/book_description.php" rel="nofollow">http://pacifichealingarts.com/book_description.php</a>  </p>
<p>It is also much deeper than YouTube&#8217;s interactivity as it launches in-screen Info Panels when you click on an object or you can launch to an external website of your choice.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

