<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Video Site Has The Best HD Quality?  CNET Has The Answer&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webvideouniversity.com/blog/2009/01/30/which-video-site-has-the-best-hd-quality-cnet-has-the-answer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webvideouniversity.com/blog/2009/01/30/which-video-site-has-the-best-hd-quality-cnet-has-the-answer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 22:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: uconcept</title>
		<link>http://webvideouniversity.com/blog/2009/01/30/which-video-site-has-the-best-hd-quality-cnet-has-the-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>uconcept</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 04:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webvideouniversity.com/blog/?p=211#comment-223</guid>
		<description>YouTube&#039;s video quality has gotten better but still I hate the bunch of adds and the &#039;related&#039; videos pull the the engine shown on the player. 

I love the quality of Motionbox and for the price and the unlimited file size upload and other features, to me is a real winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube&#8217;s video quality has gotten better but still I hate the bunch of adds and the &#8216;related&#8217; videos pull the the engine shown on the player. </p>
<p>I love the quality of Motionbox and for the price and the unlimited file size upload and other features, to me is a real winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

